Renault Clio 2012 vs Hyundai i30 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 74 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Megane, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 19 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 40 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`714 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |