Renault Clio 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 3.7 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1125 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 51 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`658 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |