Renault Clio 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 330 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`658 | 1`541 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |