Renault Clio 2012 vs Hyundai i20 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Hyundai i20 have the same engine power, but Renault Clio torque is 40 NM less than Hyundai i20. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai i20 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai i20 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai i20, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1146 litres | 1042 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 104 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`658 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`071 kg | 1`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 587 kg | 525 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Hyundai i20. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Hyundai i20 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Hyundai i20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Hyundai i20, so Hyundai i20 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |