Renault Clio 2012 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Alfa Romeo MiTo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio and Alfa Romeo MiTo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1146 litres | 684 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 30 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 462 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`658 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |