Renault Clio 2012 vs Toyota Yaris 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 347 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 47 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`588 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |