Renault Clio 2012 vs Toyota Yaris 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 21 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2017 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 347 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 47 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`588 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |