Renault Clio 2012 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Renault Captur have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 6 cm shorter than the Renault Captur, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 77 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`588 | 1`658 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Captur is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Captur has
| |