Renault Clio 2012 vs Peugeot 208 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 22 HP more power than Peugeot 208, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 208. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.4 | |
| Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 208, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 208 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Used also on Citroen C3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Renault Clio is 10 cm longer than the Peugeot 208, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 311 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1076 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 11 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 208. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 208. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`588 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 208 has
| |