Renault Clio 2012 vs Honda Jazz 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 12 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 40 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`588 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |