Renault Clio 2012 vs Honda Jazz 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 12 NM more than Honda Jazz. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 7 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`588 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |