Renault Clio 2012 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 4 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Opel Adam | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
| Renault Clio is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 653 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 10 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`588 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |