Renault Clio 2023 vs Skoda Fabia 2024
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 LPG | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 24 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.2 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1069 litres | 1190 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`641 kg | 1`574 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`144 kg | 1`103 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 497 kg | 471 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |