Renault Clio 2023 vs Skoda Fabia 2025
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Clio) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Fabia) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 76 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 366 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1069 litres | 1190 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 14 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 121 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`702 kg | 1`680 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`173 kg | 1`207 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 529 kg | 473 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |