Renault Clio 2023 vs Honda Jazz 2023
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Clio) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Jazz) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 6 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 129 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.8 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 146 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.56 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 366 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1069 litres | 1205 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Honda Jazz may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 136 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`702 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`173 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 529 kg | 445 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Honda Jazz. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |