Renault Clio 2023 vs Ford Fiesta 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Renault Clio) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Ford Fiesta) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 106 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 172 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 14.20 $ | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 126 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Clio can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Clio version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1069 litres | 1093 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Fiesta may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`758 kg | 1`660 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`238 kg | 1`205 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 455 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Ford Fiesta. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |