Renault Clio 2023 vs Toyota Yaris 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Renault Clio) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Toyota Yaris) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 5.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 210 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 252 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 17.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Clio can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Clio version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 174 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1069 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota Yaris may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`758 kg | 1`520 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`238 kg | 1`300 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 220 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 58 procentiem more than Toyota Yaris. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |