Renault Clio 2019 vs Nissan Note 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Clio) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Note) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 163 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 55 HP less power than Nissan Note, but torque is 57 NM more than Nissan Note. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 41 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Note 2017 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1069 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`702 | 1`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Note has
| |