Renault Clio 2019 vs Mazda 2 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 44 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1069 litres | 950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`702 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 2 has
| |