Renault Clio 2020 vs Toyota Yaris 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Renault Clio) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Toyota Yaris) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, but torque is 8 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Yaris can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Yaris version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 301 litres | 347 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
979 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`758 kg | 1`500 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`238 kg | 1`090 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 410 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Toyota Yaris. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |