Renault Clio 2020 vs Nissan Note 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Renault Clio) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Nissan Note) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 163 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 49 HP less power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Nissan Note. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 41 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Note 2017 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 301 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
979 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`758 | 1`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Note has
| |