Renault Clio 2020 vs Mazda 2 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Renault Clio) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Mazda 2) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 21 HP less power than Mazda 2, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 10.80 $ | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 301 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
979 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 29 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`758 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |