Renault Clio 2020 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 LPG | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 3.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Renault Clio and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1069 litres | 1125 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`631 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`137 kg | 1`280 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 494 kg | 440 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |