Renault Clio 2016 vs Hyundai i30 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 19 HP less power than Hyundai i30, but torque is 3 NM more than Hyundai i30. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2010 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Hyundai i30 2010 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Hyundai i30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`055 kg | 1`193 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 527 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Hyundai i30. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |