Renault Clio 2016 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.5 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Fabia can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Fabia version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 100 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 950 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`606 kg | 1`596 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`066 kg | 1`066 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 530 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |