Renault Clio 2016 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 65 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Opel Mokka. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Mokka can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Opel Mokka 2012 1.4 engine: The Opel 1.4 Turbo engines with codes A14NET and A14NEL are 1.4-liter turbocharged units producing around 140 hp. They use a timing chain and a cast-iron cylinder block, which contributes to decent durability when the engine is maintained properly. With regular servicing—particularly frequent oil ... More about Opel Mokka 2012 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 927 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`606 kg | 1`919 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |