Renault Clio 2016 vs Skoda Octavia 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Skoda Octavia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.5 | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Clio is 39 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 590 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1580 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 160 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 1135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`606 kg | 1`775 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`066 kg | 1`150 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 625 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |