Renault Clio 2016 vs Kia Ceed 2015

 
Renault Clio
2016 - 2018
Kia Ceed
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.1 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP120 HP
Torque: 107 NM171 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.4 seconds
Renault Clio engine produces 45 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Kia Ceed.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.65.2
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1200 km on highway
Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.51 m
Width: 1.73 m1.78 m
Height: 1.48 m1.49 m
Renault Clio is smaller.
Renault Clio is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres528 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
445 litres1642 litres
Kia Ceed has more luggage space.
Renault Clio has 98 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 1197 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6061`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data7200
Pros and Cons:
    Kia Ceed has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv