Renault Clio 2016 vs Opel Mokka 2014
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 46 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Opel Mokka. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Mokka can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Mokka version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Opel Mokka 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 927 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |