Renault Clio 2016 vs Ford Focus 2014
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 3.8 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 362 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1062 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Focus may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 617 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Ford Focus has
| |