Renault Clio 2016 vs Skoda Octavia 2013

 
Renault Clio
2016 - 2020
Skoda Octavia
2013 - 2017
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP105 HP
Torque: 220 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.8 seconds
Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Octavia.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.23.8
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1400 km in combined cycle1310 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1510 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.66 m
Width: 1.73 m1.81 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Renault Clio is smaller, but slightly higher.
Renault Clio is 39 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres590 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
445 litres1580 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space.
Renault Clio has 160 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 1135 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia.
Gross weight: no data1`855 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 46007200
Pros and Cons: Renault Clio has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Skoda Octavia has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv