Renault Clio 2016 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, but Renault Clio torque is 28 NM less than Mazda 2. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`564 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |