Renault Clio 2016 vs Dacia Logan 2008
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.3 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Clio 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Clio 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 23 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 210 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`695 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`090 kg | 1`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 605 kg | 465 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Dacia Logan. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |