Renault Clio 2016 vs Nissan Note 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.19 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Note. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.71 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.6 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Clio 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Clio 2016 1.5 engine Nissan Note 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Note 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
| Renault Clio is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1495 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 25 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`706 kg | 1`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`204 kg | 1`185 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 502 kg | 325 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem more than Nissan Note. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Nissan Note has
| |