Renault Clio 2016 vs Honda Jazz 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 90 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.4 | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Clio can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Clio version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 1 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`711 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |