Renault Clio 2013 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 45 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Captur 2012 1.2 engine: The Renault 1.2 TCe engine (H5FT) is a four-cylinder, fully aluminum turbocharged unit equipped with a 16-valve cylinder head without hydraulic lifters. It features direct fuel injection, a timing chain drive, variable valve timing on both camshafts, ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
| Renault Clio is 15 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1380 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 66 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`563 kg | 1`726 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`039 kg | 1`255 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 524 kg | 471 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Renault Captur. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Captur is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Captur has
| |