Renault Clio 2013 vs Renault Clio 2012

 
Renault Clio
2013 - 2016
Renault Clio
2012 - 2016
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol0.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP90 HP
Torque: 190 NM135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.8 seconds
Renault Clio 2013 engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Clio 2012, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Renault Clio 2012.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.3
The Renault Clio 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Clio 2013 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio 2013 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle1040 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway1210 km on highway
Renault Clio 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: no data4.06 m
Width: no data1.73 m
Height: no data1.45 m
Trunk capacity: 443 litres300 litres
Renault Clio 2013 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Clio 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight: 1`705 kg1`588 kg
Net weight:1`199 kg1`009 kg
Load capacity:506 kg579 kg
Renault Clio 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Renault Clio 2012. Therefore, Renault Clio 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
The Renault Clio 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 56004800
Pros and Cons: Renault Clio has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Renault Clio has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv