Renault Clio 2013 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Renault Captur have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.4 | |
| Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Captur 2012 1.2 engine: The Renault 1.2 TCe engine (H5FT) is a four-cylinder, fully aluminum turbocharged unit equipped with a 16-valve cylinder head without hydraulic lifters. It features direct fuel injection, a timing chain drive, variable valve timing on both camshafts, ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.57 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Captur may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`705 kg | 1`726 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`199 kg | 1`255 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 506 kg | 471 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Captur is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Captur has
| |