Renault Clio 2013 vs Renault Megane 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 30 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1380 litres | 1595 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 81 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 215 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`850 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Megane has
| |