Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Renault Clio 2003 is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Renault Clio 2003 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.1 - 2.9 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 255 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 300 NM | 93 - 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 15 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 11.9 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
Renault Clio 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio 2003. On average, a Renault Clio 2003 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Renault Clio 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 255 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 1037 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio 2003 is 2.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio 2003, which means Renault Clio 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`499 | ~ 1`501 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |