Renault Clio 2005 vs Citroen C3 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 197 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 240 NM | 94 - 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 15.2 seconds | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.4 | 4.4 - 7.2 | |
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 305 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1038 litres | 1150 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 17 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 112 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`547 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |