Renault Clio 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Auris has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 197 HP | 90 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 130 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 13.4 seconds | 8.1 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.9 | 5.0 - 7.1 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Auris. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 66 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`623 | ~ 1`777 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |