Renault Clio 2008 vs Mazda 2 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 2 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 197 HP | 68 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 121 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 13.4 seconds | 10.4 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.9 | 4.2 - 6.8 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 38 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`623 | ~ 1`496 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |