Renault Clio 2008 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda Jazz has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 197 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 13.4 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.9 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.02 m | 3.84 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 18 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 92 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`623 | ~ 1`465 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |