Renault Clio 2009 vs Nissan Note 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 110 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.6 seconds | 11.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 3.6 - 5.1 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Note, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1495 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 114 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Nissan Note has
| |