Renault Clio 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 137 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.6 seconds | 10.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 4.5 - 7.6 | |
|
On average, the Renault Clio petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Kia Ceed. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 26 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1664 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 95 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`888 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |