Renault Clio 2009 vs Hyundai i20 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 75 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 119 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.6 seconds | 9.5 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 4.4 - 6.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i20. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
| Renault Clio is 29 cm longer than the Hyundai i20, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 144 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |