Renault Clio 2013 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 120 HP | 75 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 220 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.5 seconds | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 5.5 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, a Renault Clio with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1380 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`640 kg | ~ 1`615 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`107 kg | ~ 1`137 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 533 kg | ~ 478 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |