Renault Clio 2001 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 185 NM | 94 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 9.4 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 7.1 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 992 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Peugeot 206 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`495 kg | ~ 1`521 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 950 kg | ~ 1`055 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 545 kg | ~ 466 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Peugeot 206. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |