Renault Clio 2001 vs Citroen C3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 185 NM | 94 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 10.7 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.2 - 7.1 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, a Renault Clio with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 4 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 205 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3. The Citroen C3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`495 | ~ 1`502 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |